Recent figures from the National Apprenticeship Service show that 1.4m online applications had been made for vacancies in the last 12 months, up by 32%....
In June of this year we saw the President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, sign into law federal provisions to limit “propaganda about non-traditional sexual relations” that...
Chris Hallam MBE, a leading figure for disabled sport, has passed away. He leaves a profound legacy as a highly successful Paralympian, a pioneering mentor of other...
It appears that quotas -at least when it comes to the number of women at the board level – is becoming a hotly debated topic. Last week saw the CEO of Sodexo UK and...
The Equality Act 2010 will introduce 20 key changes to Equality Law in the UK.
Find out more »
Government plans to introduce flexible parental leave have been variously described as “disappointing” and an “administrative nightmare” for employers.
The legislation, which is due to come into force in England, Scotland and Wales in 2015, will enable parents to share up to a year’s leave in order to look after their new-born children.
New mothers can currently take a maximum of 52 weeks of leave after the birth of their child, while fathers are entitled to two weeks of statutory paternity leave and can take up to six months as a block after the baby is 20 weeks old.
But the new system, which is supposed to offer “maximum flexibility”, will mean that:
Deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, who announced the move at Third Door, a centre that combines a workspace for parents with childcare for their children in Putney, west London, said that he had considered extending paternity leave too, but had backed down following concern within government and among business groups.
“I’ve accepted that extending paternity leave should be examined when the economy is in a stronger state,” Clegg said.
But Sarah Jackson, chief executive of Working Families, described the decision as “disappointing”.
HR Zone reports that international evidence showed that earmarked leave for fathers, when combined with adequate pay levels, encouraged take up, which meant that the charity would press for “further amendments to the proposals before they become law,” she added.
But Mary Clarke, employment partners with DLA Piper, said that the plans would already take some getting used to by employers. Many saw them as a “significant burden”, particularly as they had only recently had to get to grips with Additional Paternity Leave.
“Practically speaking, employers are likely to have to deal with different requests from each of their employees, making it an administrative nightmare and removing all certainty about the timing and amount of leave individual employees will take,” she warned.
Find out more
We are able to send you the full Equality Act and talk through with you (at no obligation) the main imperatives of the Act. We have also attached a 28-page summary of the Act (see below) to highlight your responsibilities and the responsibilities of your employees.
To obtain the Act in full, or to contact us for an informal and confidential discussion, please call 0845 0043513 or email email@example.com
St John's House,
54 St John's Square,
Tel: 0845 004 3513
Email: Contact Us